Medicare Advantage (MA) contract negotiations between insurers and healthcare providers are becoming increasingly contentious — and in some cases, explosive. Across the U.S., health systems and payers are clashing over reimbursement rates, care management rules, and rising operational costs, with some providers choosing to leave insurer networks altogether.
Industry experts say this shift reflects deeper structural pressures in the healthcare system, where both sides are struggling to protect margins in an era of inflation, demographic change, and policy uncertainty.

Provider-payer disputes have spiked noticeably since 2022, according to data tracked by FTI Consulting. Inflation following the pandemic caught both insurers and providers off guard, squeezing margins on long-term contracts that were negotiated before costs skyrocketed.
For providers, rising labor expenses, workforce shortages, administrative burdens, and supply costs have made existing reimbursement rates increasingly unsustainable. Many health systems argue that Medicare Advantage payments have failed to keep pace with the true cost of care delivery.
Some providers say they’ve reached a breaking point.
Hospitals report that restrictive coverage policies, prior authorization hurdles, and below-cost reimbursement rates are interfering with patient care—prompting difficult decisions to exit certain Medicare Advantage networks altogether.
Insurers, however, see the situation differently.
Payers argue that hospital billing practices, drug prices, and procedural costs continue to drive healthcare spending higher, making it harder to maintain profitability—especially within Medicare Advantage plans, which operate under tight federal benchmarks.
Many insurers underestimated the cost of deferred care during the pandemic and are now facing higher utilization and claims costs. As a result, they’ve turned to aggressive cost-containment strategies, such as increased prior authorization requirements—moves that have drawn criticism from providers, patients, and lawmakers alike.
One reason these negotiations matter so much more today is simple: Medicare Advantage has become central to the healthcare system.
For hospitals and health systems, Medicare Advantage now represents a significant—and growing—portion of their payer mix. That reality has heightened concerns that patients transitioning from employer plans to Medicare Advantage will generate lower reimbursements over time.
Unlike commercial insurance, Medicare Advantage negotiations come with built-in constraints.
MA plans are generally not required to pay providers more than traditional Medicare rates for out-of-network care. This effectively caps how much insurers are willing to offer during negotiations and limits providers’ leverage when seeking higher payments.
As a result, even as costs rise, providers have little room to push MA reimbursement rates upward—fueling frustration and hardline stances on both sides.
Hospital consolidation is also reshaping negotiations.
Large health systems created through mergers and acquisitions have more negotiating power than standalone hospitals, particularly in markets with limited competition. While this can strengthen providers’ positions, it can also intensify disputes, leading to high-profile network exits.
Upcoming policy changes are further inflaming negotiations:
With traditional revenue streams under threat, both payers and providers are racing to lock in favorable terms wherever possible—especially in Medicare Advantage contracts.
As Medicare Advantage contract negotiations grow more complex and high-stakes, providers need experienced advocates at the table. No Surprise Bill specializes in strategic payor negotiation services that help hospitals, physician groups, and healthcare organizations protect reimbursement, reduce revenue leakage, and navigate payer disputes with confidence.
Our team understands the regulatory, financial, and operational pressures shaping today’s negotiations. Contact us today to strengthen your payor strategy and safeguard your revenue.